I feel comfortable with where the students are. We are using the pilgrimage model (the stages) as our writing model. I think this is in keeping with the Fact and Faith idea. This model let us spend a lot of time "leaving home" or situating ourselves with relation to our desires, preconceptions, and misconceptions of the inquiry subject. I am asking for about 3-5 pages of the completed essay that focus on this relationship to the text--a narrative inquiry form. Then we "gathered friends or met fellow travelers" by making online polls, doing class experiments, discussing our stereotypes and ideas; this is about 2-3 pages of methodology and "development of some public sentiment or general opinion." I am hoping they can overlay their own position with the general/public opinion and, finally, with the "educated" ideas they research. So, we've finished that and they should have approx. 7 pages of generated texts.
In preparation for the journey, they had to encounter doubt or an immediate obstacle. This obstacle was the inquiry thesis and its language. We used the OED and completed word charts, keyword games, and definitions within definitions. This was fantastic and playful! Allison started relating the "cuttable" body to harvesting and fruit. Theodore started seeing how C.S. Lewis manipulated readers by giving only three language options and how one option, lunatic, comes from the word luna and a legacy of moon worship. I think this was the part of the class that excited me most but took them awhile longer to see. I've been using student packets of material to demonstrate the associative links and why leaping like this is important, academic, and interesting.
They've also set out on the journey with clarification 1 and 2, and over break the interview. The interview, for a lot of them, was another obstacle. I've noticed that the clarifications were less complicated and messy, but only a few of them were really keeping the "playful" writing of the previous exercises. I think clarification assignments and in class explanations are a work in progress.
I've let them know how soon the due date is and it caused a little panic. Then I reminded them that they have 7 pages of generated text and integration of the 2 clarifications and the interview should lead them to 11ish pages. This calmed them down a bit.
We have midterm conferences after break. The interview is due at the time of conference, we'll go over drafts together, and then we'll workshop student drafts up until the 21st.
I know we have to--Kate and Maureen--discuss "selecting" processes for our student readers. Do we want it to be the same process? Different for each class?